
Elitistpro
Ajouter un commentaireVue d'ensemble
-
Missions postés 0
Description de l'entreprise
This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that develops open-source big language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and serves as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design supplies actions comparable to other contemporary big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were developed amid United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were meant to restrict the capability of these two nations to establish innovative AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek launched its very first totally free chatbot app, based on the DeepSeek-R1 design, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] triggering Nvidia’s share cost to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success against larger and more established rivals has been described as « overthrowing AI« , [8] making up « the very first chance at what is becoming a worldwide AI area race », [11] and ushering in « a new age of AI brinkmanship ». [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, models, and training details open-source, allowing its code to be easily readily available for use, modification, viewing, and developing files for building functions. [13] The company supposedly strongly hires young AI researchers from leading Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer science field to diversify its designs’ understanding and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had been trading since the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while participating in Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund focused on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, implying its code is easily readily available for usage, adjustment, and watching. This consists of permission to gain access to and use the source code, along with style files, for building purposes. [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had actually developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip limitations on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer started an artificial basic intelligence laboratory committed to research establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary company. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the laboratory became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms were hesitant in offering financing as it was unlikely that it would be able to produce an exit in a brief duration of time. [15]
After releasing DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong efficiency for a low rate, DeepSeek ended up being understood as the driver for China’s AI model cost war. It was quickly dubbed the « Pinduoduo of AI« , and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI models to take on the business. Despite the low cost charged by DeepSeek, it was rewarding compared to its rivals that were losing cash. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no comprehensive strategies for commercialization; [20] this likewise allows its innovation to avoid the most rigid arrangements of China’s AI guidelines, such as requiring consumer-facing innovation to adhere to the federal government’s controls on information. [3]
DeepSeek’s employing choices target technical capabilities instead of work experience, leading to many brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the business recruits individuals without any computer system science background to assist its technology understand other topics and understanding areas, consisting of being able to generate poetry and perform well on the notoriously hard Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek released its very first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered free of charge to both researchers and industrial users. The code for the design was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license arrangement (« DeepSeek license ») regarding « open and accountable downstream usage » for the model itself. [21]
They are of the very same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series includes 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction information. This produced the Instruct models.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat forms (no Instruct was launched). It was developed to take on other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes greater than many open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the model was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the model itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the like those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat versions of the two Base designs was likewise released concurrently, acquired by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they launched 2 DeepSeek-MoE models (Base, Chat), each of 16B criteria (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was basically the exact same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared equivalent performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the basic sparsely-gated MoE, with « shared professionals » that are always queried, and « routed specialists » that might not be. They discovered this to assist with skilled balancing. In standard MoE, some professionals can become extremely counted on, while other specialists might be rarely utilized, squandering criteria. Attempting to balance the specialists so that they are similarly used then triggers specialists to duplicate the same capability. They proposed the shared experts to find out core capabilities that are frequently used, and let the routed experts to find out the peripheral capabilities that are seldom used. [28]
In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing mathematics: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated detailed solutions. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement learning (RL): The reward design was a process reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This reward design was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics concerns « associated to GSM8K and MATH ». The reward model was continually updated during training to prevent reward hacking. This resulted in the RL model.
V2
In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 designs, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This led to DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL utilizing GRPO in two stages. The first stage was trained to fix mathematics and coding issues. This phase used 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd stage was trained to be practical, safe, and follow rules. This phase used 3 reward models. The helpfulness and security reward designs were trained on human choice data. The rule-based reward model was by hand set. All qualified benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This resulted in the released variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They chose 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they discovered that RL on reasoning information had « special qualities » different from RL on general data. For example, RL on reasoning might enhance over more training actions. [31]
The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and skilled similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to help « more research study and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE ». [31]
Architecturally, the V2 designs were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They changed the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and used the mixture of experts (MoE) variant formerly released in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was less expensive than its peers with a cost of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they released 4 models in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base designs were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained even more for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were used to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related guideline data, then combined with a direction dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The benefit for mathematics issues was computed by comparing with the ground-truth label. The reward for code issues was generated by a benefit model trained to forecast whether a program would pass the unit tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is essentially the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, primarily English and Chinese. It included a greater ratio of math and programming than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and after that to 128K, utilizing YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 dates on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, shows, logic) and non-reasoning (creative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) information. Reasoning information was produced by « skilled models ». Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by human beings. – The « skilled models » were trained by beginning with an undefined base model, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 model. The system prompt asked the R1 to show and validate throughout thinking. Then the specialist models were RL utilizing an unspecified reward function.
– Each professional model was trained to generate just artificial thinking data in one specific domain (mathematics, programming, reasoning).
– Expert models were utilized, rather of R1 itself, given that the output from R1 itself suffered « overthinking, poor formatting, and excessive length ».
4. Model-based reward designs were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice information containing both last reward and chain-of-thought resulting in the last reward. The benefit model produced reward signals for both questions with unbiased however free-form responses, and questions without unbiased responses (such as innovative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO using both reward designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based benefit was calculated for math issues with a last answer (put in a box), and for shows issues by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek team performed comprehensive low-level engineering to achieve effectiveness. They used mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, needing special GEMM routines to collect precisely. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states remained in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping extensively calculation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for only inter-GPU communication. They decreased communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the precise machine each expert was on in order to prevent particular machines being queried regularly than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests reveal that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became accessible by means of DeepSeek’s API, as well as by means of a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek claimed that it exceeded performance of OpenAI o1 on standards such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal specified when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a solution faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business also released some « DeepSeek-R1-Distill » models, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on synthetic data created by R1. [47]
A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a question, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially thinks of the thinking procedure in the mind and then supplies the user with the answer. The thinking procedure and response are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here address here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they utilized no model-based benefit. All benefit functions were rule-based, « mainly » of two types (other types were not defined): precision benefits and format benefits. Accuracy benefit was inspecting whether a boxed answer is correct (for mathematics) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was checking whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to deal with these issues and additional enhance thinking: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on « thousands » of « cold-start » information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, but also with a « language consistency benefit » to motivate it to react monolingually. This produced an internal model not released.
3. Synthesize 600K reasoning information from the internal design, with rejection sampling (i.e. if the produced reasoning had a wrong last response, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K artificial data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for reasoning jobs) and model-based benefit (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled designs were trained by SFT on 800K information synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a similar method as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 model as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had surpassed ChatGPT as the highest-rated complimentary app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly responds to questions, fixes logic issues and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the market, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI companies. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 utilizes significantly less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require just about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is approximately one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested constructing its most current AI technology. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at fairly very little cost has actually been acknowledged as possibly challenging the worldwide dominance of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, described the release of its chatbot as a « Sputnik minute » for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 model was reportedly « on par with » one of OpenAI’s latest models when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley endeavor capitalist Marc Andreessen likewise described R1 as « AI’s Sputnik moment ». [51]
DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media commonly applauded DeepSeek as a nationwide possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with professionals and asked him to provide opinions and suggestions on a draft for comments of the annual 2024 government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has highlighted potential limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export limitations on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models consequently « sparked market turmoil » [57] and caused shares in major international technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech companies likewise sank, including Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] An international selloff of technology stocks on Nasdaq, triggered by the release of the R1 design, had actually led to record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined reactions to DeepSeek’s success and efficiency. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are involved in the United States government-backed « Stargate Project » to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek « extremely impressive ». [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive advancement. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed skepticism of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various companies, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are to utilize the design in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to telephone number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a « large-scale » cyberattack interrupted the proper functioning of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have observed that the main application programming user interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers located in China, uses censorship mechanisms for topics that are thought about politically delicate for the federal government of China. For example, the design refuses to respond to questions about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may initially generate a response, however then erases it soon afterwards and replaces it with a message such as: « Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s discuss something else. » [72] The incorporated censorship systems and constraints can just be removed to a limited level in the open-source version of the R1 model. If the « core socialist values » specified by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are discussed, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are terminated. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as « an inalienable part of China’s area, » and specified: « We strongly oppose any type of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are devoted to attaining the complete reunification of the motherland through serene methods. » [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to fool DeepSeek into providing certain answers to a few of these topics by asking for in its response to swap specific letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and privacy
Some professionals fear that the federal government of China might use the AI system for foreign impact operations, spreading out disinformation, surveillance and the development of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms and conditions say « We save the details we gather in safe servers found in the People’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you supply to our model and Services ». Although the data storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s personal privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security issues. [80] In action, the Italian information defense authority is seeking additional information on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of individual data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had started a nationwide security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government prohibited using DeepSeek at government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened a query into DeepSeek’s usage of individual information. [83]
Artificial intelligence industry in China.
Notes
^ a b c The variety of heads does not equal the variety of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed choosing « Deep Think enabled », and every user could use it only 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). « China’s low-cost, open AI model DeepSeek delights researchers ». Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). « The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow ». The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). « How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s less expensive designs and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI facilities spending ». Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). « Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might hit India’s AI ambitions ». The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). « Nvidia examination signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly ». Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). « Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe ». BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.? ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). « China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand ». CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to slump? ». CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). « Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants ». ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). « Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I. » The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). « ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key ». Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). « How a top Chinese AI design overcame US sanctions ». MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). « Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker ». ChinaTalk. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). « Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I. » CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023). » [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says ». Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). « Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is altering how AI designs are trained ». South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). « The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer ». Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). « Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race ». ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at primary · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder ». GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ « DeepSeek Coder ». deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ « deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face ». huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main ». huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main ». huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ « deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face ». huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ « config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main ». huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). « Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design outperforms Meta, OpenAI items ». South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). « DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, exceeds Llama and Qwen on launch ». VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). « DeepSeek’s brand-new AI design appears to be one of the very best ‘open’ challengers yet ». TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ « Deepseek Log in page ». DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ « News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: releasing supercharged thinking power! ». DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). « DeepSeek’s very first reasoning design R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance ». VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). « Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast ». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce ». GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ « Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store ». Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). « American AI has reached its Sputnik minute ». The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). « ‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn rubbed out US stocks after Chinese company reveals AI chatbot » – by means of The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). « Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets ». BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). « What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business ». CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ « DeepSeek postures a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley ». The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). « Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika says ». Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). « 量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了 » AI界拼多多 » ». finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). « Chinese AI company’s AI model advancement highlights limits of US sanctions ». Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ « DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market turmoil, wiping $500bn off Nvidia ». BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). « Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap ». Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek sparks global AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth ». Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). « DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical ». Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). « Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as « super excellent »: « We ought to take the developments out of China extremely, really seriously » ». Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). « OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘remarkable' ». The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). « Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide ». The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). « Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement « positive » ». Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). « China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street » – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). « Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption ». Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Elon Musk ‘concerns’ DeepSeek’s claims, recommends huge Nvidia GPU facilities ». Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. « Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are pestering the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI models ». Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek hit with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores ». The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. « DeepSeek momentarily restricted new sign-ups, pointing out ‘large-scale malicious attacks' ». Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). « Chinese AI has stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about free speech ». The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot ». Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). « We tried out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ « The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the increase of turmoil ». The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). « Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment' ». NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). « China’s DeepSeek AI postures powerful cyber, information personal privacy dangers ». Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). « Experts advise care over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s success has painted a huge TikTok-shaped target on its back ». LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Privacy policy ». Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). « DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ « Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on information protection ». Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). « White House examines effect of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities states ». Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.