Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language models (LLMs), allowed an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with various smaller firms have actually established generative AI designs. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has uses throughout a large range of industries, consisting of software advancement, health care, finance, entertainment, customer support, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] style, [18] and product design. [19] However, issues have been raised about the prospective misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using fake news or deepfakes to trick or manipulate individuals, and the mass replacement of human tasks. [20] [21] Copyright law concerns likewise exist around generative models that are trained on and imitate copyrighted works of art. [22]

Early history

Since its creation, researchers in the field have actually raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the effects of developing synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these concerns have formerly been checked out by misconception, fiction and viewpoint given that antiquity. [23] The principle of automated art dates back at least to the automata of ancient Greek civilization, where innovators such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were described as having created devices efficient in writing text, producing sounds, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of imaginative automations has actually grown throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s automaton developed in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have long been utilized to model natural languages considering that their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov published his first paper on the subject in 1906, [27] [28] and examined the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is discovered on a text corpus, it can then be utilized as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic expert system

The scholastic discipline of expert system was established at a research workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced numerous waves of improvement and optimism in the years because. [31] Artificial Intelligence research began in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have used expert system to create artistic works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was creating and showing generative AI works developed by AARON, the computer program Cohen created to create paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to describe AI planning systems, especially computer-aided procedure preparation, utilized to generate series of actions to reach a defined objective. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems utilized symbolic AI approaches such as state space search and restraint satisfaction and were a « reasonably fully grown » technology by the early 1990s. They were used to create crisis action strategies for military use, [35] process strategies for producing [33] and choice strategies such as in prototype self-governing spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural webs (2014-2019)

Since its creation, the field of artificial intelligence utilized both discriminative models and generative designs, to design and forecast information. Beginning in the late 2000s, the emergence of deep knowing drove development and research study in image classification, speech recognition, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this period were typically trained as discriminative designs, due to the difficulty of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, advancements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first practical deep neural networks capable of discovering generative designs, instead of discriminative ones, for intricate data such as images. These deep generative designs were the very first to output not only class labels for images but also whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed advancements in generative models compared to older Long-Short Term Memory models, [38] resulting in the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), understood as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the ability to generalize without supervision to various jobs as a Structure design. [40]

The new generative models introduced during this period allowed for big neural networks to be trained utilizing without supervision learning or semi-supervised learning, rather than the supervised knowing common of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning eliminated the need for human beings to manually identify data, enabling bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, developed by a confidential MIT researcher, was a totally free web application that could create convincing character voices using minimal training data. [42] The platform is credited as the very first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content development, affecting subsequent developments in voice AI technology. [43] [44]

In 2021, the introduction of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative design, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further equalized access to high-quality synthetic intelligence art production from natural language prompts. [46] These systems showed unprecedented capabilities in generating photorealistic images, artwork, and designs based upon text descriptions, leading to widespread adoption amongst artists, designers, and the basic public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT changed the availability and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to participate in natural discussions, create creative material, assist with coding, and perform different analytical jobs caught global attention and stimulated widespread discussion about AI’s possible effect on work, education, and creativity. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another dive in generative AI capabilities. A team from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it « could fairly be seen as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial basic intelligence (AGI) system. » [49] However, this assessment was objected to by other scholars who preserved that generative AI stayed « still far from reaching the standard of ‘general human intelligence' » as of 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model combining several methods including text, images, video, thermal information, 3D information, audio, and motion, paving the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google unveiled Gemini, a multimodal AI model readily available in 4 versions: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company incorporated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and announced prepare for « Bard Advanced » powered by the larger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google unified Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, launching a mobile app on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic launched the Claude 3 household of large language designs, consisting of Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models demonstrated considerable improvements in capabilities across various standards, with Claude 3 Opus notably outperforming leading models from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed improved efficiency compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, especially in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a survey by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has become a global leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants utilizing the innovation, surpassing both the worldwide average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is additional evidenced by China’s copyright advancements in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, considerably surpassing the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by using unsupervised device learning (invoking for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised maker finding out trained on a dataset. The abilities of a generative AI system depend on the modality or kind of the data set used. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take just one kind of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For instance, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of large language models). They can natural language processing, device translation, and natural language generation and can be used as structure models for other tasks. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, large language designs can be trained on shows language text, allowing them to produce source code for new computer system programs. [63] Examples include OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing premium visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions include Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are commonly used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer system vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can also be trained extensively on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech abilities. An early pioneer in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which demonstrated the ability to clone character voices utilizing as low as 15 seconds of training data. [67] The site gained prevalent attention for its capability to produce emotionally meaningful speech for various imaginary characters, though it was later taken offline in 2022 due to copyright issues. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options subsequently emerged, consisting of ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music together with text annotations, in order to generate brand-new musical samples based on text descriptions such as a relaxing violin tune backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been created, like the tune Savages, which used AI to imitate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising a dispute about whether artists ought to get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have actually been created that can be produced using a text phrase, category choices, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can produce temporally-coherent, comprehensive and photorealistic video. Examples include Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can also be trained on the motions of a robotic system to produce brand-new trajectories for motion preparation or navigation. For example, UniPi from Google Research utilizes prompts like « get blue bowl » or « wipe plate with yellow sponge » to manage motions of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal « vision-language-action » designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out basic thinking in response to user triggers and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when given the prompt pick up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other items. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially intelligent computer-aided style (CAD) can use text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries might also be established using connected open data of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are used as tools to assist improve workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI designs are utilized to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, shows tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video items such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI features have actually been integrated into a range of existing commercially available products such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are also readily available as open-source software, consisting of Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI designs with as much as a few billion specifications can run on smartphones, embedded devices, and computers. For instance, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion parameters) can operate on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one variation of Stable Diffusion can work on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with 10s of billions of criteria can work on laptop computer or home computer. To attain an acceptable speed, models of this size might require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon items. For example, the 65 billion parameter variation of LLaMA can be set up to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI locally consist of security of privacy and intellectual residential or commercial property, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific focuses on utilizing consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such techniques as compression. That online forum is among just two sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language model benchmarks. [93] Yann LeCun has actually promoted open-source models for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI security. [95]

Language models with numerous billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, normally work on datacenter computers equipped with selections of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These extremely large models are typically accessed as cloud services online.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced constraints on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips used for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were developed to meet the requirements of the sanctions.

There is free software application on the market efficient in recognizing text generated by generative expert system (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video coming from it. [99] Potential mitigation techniques for finding generative AI content consist of digital watermarking, material authentication, details retrieval, and machine knowing classifier designs. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both free and paid AI text detectors have actually regularly produced false positives, incorrectly accusing students of submitting AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and policy

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary arrangement with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 applied the Defense Production Act to need all US business to report details to the federal government when training specific high-impact AI models. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Expert system Act consists of requirements to reveal copyrighted product utilized to train generative AI systems, and to identify any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China regulates any public-facing generative AI. It includes requirements to watermark created images or videos, regulations on training information and label quality, restrictions on personal information collection, and a guideline that generative AI must « adhere to socialist core worths ». [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on large, publicly available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI developers have argued that such training is safeguarded under fair use, while copyright holders have actually argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair usage training have argued that it is a transformative use and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the general public. [110] Critics have actually argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] and that generative AI programs complete with the content they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, several suits connected to using copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has sued Stability AI over making use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York Times have actually taken legal action against Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A different question is whether AI-generated works can certify for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by synthetic intelligence without any human input can not be copyrighted, due to the fact that they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the office has actually also begun taking public input to identify if these rules require to be improved for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The advancement of generative AI has raised concerns from federal governments, businesses, and people, resulting in protests, legal actions, contacts us to pause AI experiments, and actions by numerous federal governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned « Generative AI has massive capacity for excellent and wicked at scale », that AI may « turbocharge worldwide development » and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the international economy by 2030, but that its destructive usage « could trigger horrific levels of death and destruction, prevalent injury, and deep mental damage on an unthinkable scale ». [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have been arguments advanced by ELIZA creator Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether jobs that can be done by computers in fact should be done by them, given the distinction between computer systems and people, and in between quantitative computations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has led to 70% of the jobs for video game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor disagreements. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, stated that « expert system postures an existential hazard to innovative professions » throughout the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been viewed as a potential obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The crossway of AI and employment concerns among underrepresented groups internationally stays a critical element. While AI assures efficiency enhancements and skill acquisition, issues about task displacement and biased recruiting processes persist among these groups, as outlined in studies by Fast Company. To take advantage of AI for a more fair society, proactive actions incorporate mitigating predispositions, advocating transparency, respecting personal privacy and permission, and embracing diverse teams and ethical considerations. Strategies involve redirecting policy emphasis on regulation, inclusive design, and education’s potential for personalized mentor to make the most of advantages while minimizing damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI designs can reflect and enhance any cultural predisposition present in the underlying information. For example, a language model might presume that medical professionals and judges are male, which secretaries or nurses are female, if those predispositions prevail in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image model prompted with the text « a photo of a CEO » might disproportionately generate pictures of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially prejudiced data set. A variety of techniques for alleviating predisposition have actually been attempted, such as changing input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of « deep knowing » and « fake » [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and replace them with somebody else’s similarity using artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have actually amassed extensive attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake celebrity pornographic videos, vengeance pornography, fake news, scams, health disinformation, financial fraud, and concealed foreign election interference. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has elicited responses from both industry and federal government to discover and restrict their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically discovered that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when prompted to do so, such as pictures of electoral fraud in the United States and Muslim ladies supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (distributed ledger innovation) to promote « transparency, verifiability, and decentralization in AI development and usage ». [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software application to produce controversial statements in the vocal style of celebrities, public authorities, and other well-known individuals have raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have stated that they would deal with mitigating prospective abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have generated from AI-generated music. The exact same software utilized to clone voices has actually been utilized on famous artists’ voices to develop songs that mimic their voices, acquiring both tremendous appeal and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar methods have likewise been used to develop enhanced quality or full-length variations of songs that have been leaked or have yet to be released. [155]

Generative AI has also been used to develop new digital artist personalities, with a few of these getting sufficient attention to get record offers at major labels. [156] The designers of these virtual artists have actually likewise faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of reaction for « dehumanizing » an artform, and likewise developing artists which produce unrealistic or immoral attract their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s ability to develop practical fake material has been exploited in many kinds of cybercrime, consisting of phishing scams. [158] Deepfake video and audio have actually been used to develop disinformation and scams. In 2020, former Google click scams czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that when deepfake videos end up being completely reasonable, they would stop appearing remarkable to audiences, potentially leading to uncritical approval of incorrect info. [159] Additionally, big language designs and other types of text-generation AI have actually been used to create phony evaluations of e-commerce websites to improve scores. [160] Cybercriminals have developed large language designs focused on scams, consisting of WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 study showed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and timely injection attacks, making it possible for aggressors to obtain aid with damaging demands, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other scientists have actually shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to eliminate their security restrictions at low expense. [163]

Reliance on market giants

Training frontier AI designs needs a massive amount of calculating power. Usually just Big Tech companies have the financial resources to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up buying access to data centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and journalists have revealed issues about the ecological impact that the advancement and release of generative designs are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big quantities of freshwater utilized for data centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical energy usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise concern that these effects might increase as these models are included into commonly used online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications become more popular; [170] [169] and as models need to be retrained. [170]

Proposed mitigation methods include factoring possible environmental costs prior to design advancement or data collection, [165] increasing effectiveness of information centers to decrease electricity/energy use, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] building more effective device finding out models, [168] [166] [169] minimizing the variety of times that models require to be retrained, [167] developing a government-directed framework for auditing the environmental impact of these designs, [168] [167] controling for transparency of these models, [167] regulating their energy and water usage, [168] encouraging scientists to publish information on their models’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the number of subject matter experts who understand both artificial intelligence and environment science. [167]

Content quality

The New York Times specifies slop as analogous to spam: « substandard or unwanted A.I. content in social networks, art, books and … in search results. » [172] Journalists have expressed issues about the scale of low-grade created content with regard to social media material moderation, [173] the financial rewards from social media companies to spread such material, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific term paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to discover higher quality or desired content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of generated content by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper published by researchers at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a picture of web pages, were device translated. A lot of these automated translations were seen as lower quality, specifically for sentences that were translated across a minimum of three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were equated throughout more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that computed word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had stopped updating the information for numerous reasons: high expenses for obtaining data from Reddit and Twitter, extreme focus on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing neighborhood, which « generative AI has contaminated the data ». [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused a surge of AI-generated content across numerous domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 scholarly articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely written with LLM assistance. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, roughly 17.5% of recently published computer technology documents and 16.9% of peer evaluation text now incorporate content produced by LLMs. [183]

Visual material follows a similar trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is estimated that approximately 34 million images have been produced daily. As of August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been produced using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by designs based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is included in brand-new data crawls from the Internet for additional training of AI models, flaws in the resulting designs may take place. [185] Training an AI model specifically on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this procedure, where each new model is trained on the previous design’s output, results in progressive degradation and ultimately leads to a « design collapse » after several versions. [186] Tests have actually been performed with pattern acknowledgment of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the value of data collected from real human interactions with systems may become progressively valuable in the existence of LLM-generated content in data crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial information is frequently utilized as an alternative to information produced by real-world events. Such data can be deployed to confirm mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence designs while protecting user personal privacy, [188] consisting of for structured information. [189] The technique is not restricted to text generation; image generation has been utilized to train computer system vision designs. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had actually been using an undisclosed internal AI tool to compose at least 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle released a phony AI-generated interview with former racing driver Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public appearances given that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a skiing mishap. The story consisted of 2 possible disclosures: the cover included the line « stealthily genuine », and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired shortly afterwards amid the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have published articles whose content and/or byline have actually been confirmed or presumed to be developed by generative AI designs – frequently with false material, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI use – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had utilized generative AI to produce articles for a lot of the aforementioned outlets, appeared to reveal that they « had actually produced tens of countless articles for more than 150 publishers. » [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based upon Generative AI models, prompting concerns about task losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has actually historically been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically created anchors have actually likewise been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google supposedly pitched a tool to news outlets that claimed to « produce news stories » based upon input information offered, such as « information of present events ». Some news company executives who viewed the pitch explained it as » [taking] for given the effort that entered into producing precise and artful newspaper article. » [224]

In February 2024, Google introduced a program to pay little publishers to write 3 posts per day utilizing a beta generative AI design. The program does not need the understanding or approval of the sites that the publishers are using as sources, nor does it require the published articles to be labeled as being produced or assisted by these designs. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have gone through cybersquatting, with short articles created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have actually revealed issue that generative AI could have a harmful impact on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for exploring with generative AI, with Axios keeping in mind the possibility of generative AI companies creating a dependence for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based on Llama 3 which summarizes newspaper article, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly more decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In action to possible risks around the usage and abuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about declining audience trust, outlets worldwide, including publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually released standards around how they plan to utilize and not use AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of individuals in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are unpleasant with news produced by « primarily AI with some human oversight », and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfy. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfy with news produced by « primarily human with some help from AI ». The outcomes of international surveys reported that people were more uneasy with news subjects consisting of politics (46%), criminal activity (43%), and local news (37%) produced by AI than other news subjects. [241]

Computer programs portal

Technology website

Artificial general intelligence – Kind of AI with wide-ranging capabilities
Artificial creativity – Artificial simulation of human creativity
Expert system art – Visual media developed with AI
Artificial life – Field of research study
Chatbot – Program that mimics discussion
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep knowing technique
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of big language design
Large language model – Kind of device learning model
Music and expert system – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI pornography – Explicit material produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is developed algorithmically instead of by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Kind of details retrieval using LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term utilized in artificial intelligence

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). « Executive Order N-12-23 » (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). « Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework ». arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ « What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI? ». McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ « What is generative AI? ». IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). « Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). « Generative models ». OpenAI. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). « Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding ». The New York Times. Archived from the initial on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). « A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings ». Bloomberg News. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). « OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). « LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications ». arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). « A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze ». The New York Times. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). « OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ « The race of the AI labs warms up ». The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). « Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, organizations, and governments ». Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the original on March 28, 2024, recovered January 21, 2024
^ « Don’t fear an AI-induced tasks apocalypse right now ». The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). « In Hollywood authors’ battle versus AI, humans win (in the meantime) ». AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the initial on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. « Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion ». Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ « How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity ». Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). « Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI ». techpolicy.press. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). « Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown ». Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ « New AI systems hit copyright law ». BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robotic from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the original on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), « The Automata in the Byzantine « Throne of Solomon » », Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). « Maillardet’s Automaton ». The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). « First Links in the Markov Chain ». American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). « The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications ». Machine Learning. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Look For Expert System. New York City, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). « A Quick History of Generative AI » (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). « Computer helped process preparation: the state-of-the-art study ». The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). « Automated planning and scheduling for goal-based self-governing spacecraft ». IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI organizer based upon the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a conventional spacecraft mindset control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also include an architectural element explicitly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and monitoring.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). « A Detailed Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT ». arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ « finetune-transformer-lm ». GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). « Language designs are without supervision multitask learners » (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). « Improving language comprehending with not being watched knowing ». OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). « Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning ». Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). « 15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon ». The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). « Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost? ». Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some form considering that ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). « OpenAI’s DALL-E develops plausible pictures of actually anything you ask it to ». TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ « Stable Diffusion Public Release ». Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). « What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it replace humans? ». The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). « How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an « anything tool » ». Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). « Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4 ». arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). « ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science ». Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ « Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that integrates 6 kinds of information ». May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). « Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI ». The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). « Google launches Gemini-a powerful AI design it states can go beyond GPT-4 ». Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). « Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant ». The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ « Introducing the next generation of Claude ». Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). « Anthropic unveils Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests ». Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). « Anthropic has a fast brand-new AI model – and a smart brand-new method to interact with chatbots ». The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). « China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, survey shows ». Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ « A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4 ». March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ « Explainer: What is Generative AI, the innovation behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT? ». Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). « Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive.' ». The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). « On the opportunities and dangers of foundation designs ». arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). « Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code ». arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ « Buying Cursor ». Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex « Sandy »; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). « Art and the science of generative AI ». Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). « Zero-shot text-to-image generation ». International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). « Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence ». Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). « 15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon ». The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). « Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App ». Game Informer. Archived from the original on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). « ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる » [Game Character Voice Reading Software « 15. ai » Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the original on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please keep in mind that just English voices are available.; Another significant function of 15. ai is its abundant psychological expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). « A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless ». The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). « MusicLM: Generating Music From Text ». arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). « Meta in June stated that it utilized 20,000 hours of licensed music to train MusicGen, that included 10,000 « top quality » certified music tracks. At the time, Meta’s scientists outlined in a paper the ethical obstacles that they came across around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen ». Archived from the original on August 15, 2023.
^ « Jay-Z’s Delaware producer triggers argument over AI rights ». Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ « 10 « Best » AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI ». October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). « Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology ». The New York City Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). « Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text ». cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). « UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation ». Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). « RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control ». arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). « 10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators ». eWEEK. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ « Slash CAD design develop times with new AI-driven part creation method|GlobalSpec ». Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ « The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry ». March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). « GitHub has a vision to make code more safe by style ». Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). « Text-to-video AI inches better as start-up Runway announces brand-new model ». The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is simple. Runway states it’ll be making its new generative video model, Gen-2, available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). « Microsoft adds OpenAI technology to Word and Excel ». CNBC. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system innovations such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of company software … the brand-new A.I. functions, dubbed Copilot, will be readily available in some of the business’s most popular business apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). « The app’s Memories function just got a big upgrade ». TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a redesigned, AI-powered Memories feature … you’ll be able to utilize generative AI to come up with some suggested names like « a desert adventure ».
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). « Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop ». MediaPost. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will end up being one of the most essential features for creative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday unveiled a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI abilities into design.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). « LLaMA 2: How to access and usage Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot today ». VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself device or modify the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). « How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4 ». Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can develop a ChatGPT-like server based upon LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). «  »Draw Things » App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone ». The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated in your area, so you do not require a Web connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). « Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model in your home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD) ». Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA model at home, you will need a computer construct with an effective GPU that can handle the large quantity of data and computation needed for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). « Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot ». Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). « I practically only trust two LLM evals right now » (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). « Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs … » (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). « Open source platforms * increase * safety and security » (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). « U.S. authorities order Nvidia to stop sales of top AI chips to China ». Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). « Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed ». Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while complying with stringent U.S. export standards that limit how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). « How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions ». Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ « 5 totally free software to recognise fake AI-generated images » (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ « Detecting AI finger prints: A guide to watermarking and beyond ». Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the initial on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). « We tested a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent student ». washingtonpost.com. Archived from the original on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). « Detecting AI may be impossible. That’s a big problem for instructors ». washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). « OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI material for security, White House states ». Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ « FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence ». The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). « 3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI« . Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ « EU AI Act: very first policy on synthetic intelligence ». European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). « EU legislators vote for tougher AI rules as draft relocate to last ». Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). « China states generative AI guidelines to apply only to items for the general public ». Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ « 生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 ». July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b « Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law ». Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). « We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image ». The New York City Times. Archived from the original on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). « The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots ». Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). « Photo huge Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s also welcoming the technology ». AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). « The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Getting Started ». Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). « New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement ». Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). « AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court says ». Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). « US Copyright Office wishes to hear what individuals think of AI and copyright ». The Verge. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ « Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System ». un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ « The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI ». Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). « Lessons from Eliza ». The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). « AI is already taking computer game illustrators’ jobs in China ». Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). « China’s game art market supposedly annihilated by growing AI use ». Game Developer. Archived from the original on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). « Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of advanced tech ». NBC News. Archived from the original on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually signed up with the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding an agreement that explicitly requires AI guidelines to protect writers and the works they develop. … The future of generative expert system in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to replace labor-has become an important sticking point for stars going on strike. In a press conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more frequently called SAG-AFTRA), stated that ‘artificial intelligence positions an existential danger to innovative professions, and all actors and entertainers deserve agreement language that protects them from having their identity and skill made use of without authorization and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). « ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools launch out of beta ». TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. « ‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods ». Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). « Underrepresented groups in nations around the globe are fretted about AI being a danger to jobs ». Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). « Large language designs are biased. Can logic conserve them? ». MIT CSAIL. Archived from the initial on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). « Reducing predisposition and enhancing security in DALL · E 2 ». OpenAI. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). « No quick fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 showed the difficulties of predisposition in AI ». NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ « DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations ». OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). « Terrifying modern porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise ». Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). « We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now ». Vice. Archived from the initial on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ « What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying ». Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ « Experts fear face swapping tech might start an international showdown ». The Outline. Archived from the initial on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). « Here Come the Fake Videos, Too ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). « Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting ». arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). « Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance ». JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the original on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). « U.S. braces for foreign interference in 2024 election ». Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). « Russia, Iran use AI to boost anti-U.S. impact campaigns, officials state ». The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ « Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) ». deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the initial on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). « H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019 ». www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ « New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections ». Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). « Disinformation wars: The fight against fake news in the age of AI ». New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). « Navigating the challenges of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of synthetic intelligence and blockchain ». Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ « People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips ». PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ « The generative A.I. software application race has begun ». Fortune. Archived from the initial on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). « Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, say experts ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ « Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes ». news.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). « 4chan users embrace AI voice clone tool to produce celeb hatespeech ». The Verge. Archived from the original on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). « Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I. » The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ « A brand-new AI voice tool is currently being abused to make deepfake star audio clips ». Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). « Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good ». Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). « An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World ». The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). « AI songs that simulate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry ». ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. « Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs ». Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. « Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music? ». Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). « Warner Music signs first-ever record handle AI pop star ». New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). « Deepfakes: Prepare yourself for phishing 2.0 ». Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. « As social networks platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ predicts the most significant danger is that deepfakes will ultimately become dull ». Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). « Fake evaluations: can we trust what we read online as use of AI blows up? ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ « After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data ». PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). « From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy ». IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). « Should we make our most effective AI models open source to all? ». Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). « In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends ». New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). « On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big? ». Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d « AI is an energy hog. This is what it indicates for climate change ». MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). « The carbon impact of expert system ». Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). « Generative AI’s environmental costs are soaring – and primarily secret ». Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the initial on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. « AI‘s Energy Demands Run out Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). « Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer scientist explains the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins ». The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). « Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet? ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). « First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop' ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b « Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook ». Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). « The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop ». The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). « Research AI model all of a sudden tries to customize its own code to extend runtime ». Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). « Spam, junk … slop? The current wave of AI behind the ‘zombie internet' ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). « Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles ». 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop ». Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). « A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism ». Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). « A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine ». VICE. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). « Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data' ». 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has actually constantly been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, « it was manageable and frequently recognizable. Large language models create text that masquerades as genuine language with objective behind it, although there is none, and their output appear all over, » she wrote. She offers the example that ChatGPT overuses the word « dig, » in such a way that individuals do not, which has actually thrown off the frequency of this specific word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). « ChatGPT « contamination »: approximating the occurrence of LLMs in the scholarly literature ». arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). « Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models? ». Human-Centered Expert System. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). « AI Image Statistics for 2024: Just How Much Content Was Created by AI ». Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). « AI models collapse when trained on recursively produced information ». Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). « When A.I.’s Output Is a Risk to A.I. Itself ». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « Self-Consuming Generative Models Freak ». ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). « Synthetic Data for Better Artificial Intelligence ». databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). « Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data ». .com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). « Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion ». arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). « CNET found errors in majority of its AI-written stories ». The Verge. Archived from the original on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ « A publication promoted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was actually AI ». NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). « Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is « Entirely » Comprised ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ « NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ utilizing AI ». Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). « Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). « Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article ». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). « B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person ». PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). « USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). « Dispatch stops briefly AI sports composing program ». Axios. Archived from the original on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). « Mysterious bylines appeared on an USA Today site. Did these writers exist? ». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab air conditioner « Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry ». Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). « How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business ». CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). « News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian local news stories a week ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). « Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Relocate To AI Content ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). « Coming to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories ». Vox. Archived from the initial on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). « The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb ». Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). « Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors ». Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). « Irish Times apologises for scam AI short article about women’s use of fake tan ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). « CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). « BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles ». Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ « Newsweek is making generative AI a component in its newsroom ». Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ « What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated regional news, everything – and nothing ». Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ « AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for traditional publishers? ». San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). « A nationwide network of regional news sites is publishing AI-written posts under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm ». CNN. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ « Wyoming reporter caught using artificial intelligence to develop phony quotes and stories ». Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « Cosmos Magazine publishes AI-generated posts, drawing criticism from journalists, co-founders ». ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « AI-generated articles are penetrating significant news publications ». National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). « Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans ». Wired. Archived from the initial on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « Apple says it will upgrade AI feature after unreliable news informs ». The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ « TV channels are using AI-generated presenters to read the news. The concern is, will we trust them? ». BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). « ‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). « World’s very first AI news anchor revealed in China ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ « These ISIS news anchors are AI phonies. Their propaganda is genuine ». Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the original on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). « Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles ». The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). « Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform ». Adweek. Archived from the original on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). « Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). « How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Turned Into an AI Clickbait Farm ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). « A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff ». 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). « Early Apple tech blog writers are surprised to find their name and work have actually been AI-zombified ». The Verge. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ « AI slop is currently attacking Oregon’s local journalism ». Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the original on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). « How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory ». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). « We Need Your Email Address ». 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ « Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket ». Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the initial on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). « Senators warn AI might cause ‘damage’ of local news ». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ « OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news offer ». Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). « Meta walked away from news. Now the company’s utilizing it for AI material ». Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ « How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools ». Wired. Archived from the original on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). « Standards around generative AI ». Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). « The Guardian’s method to generative AI ». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). « Policies in parallel? A relative study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations ». pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). « Digital Report 2024 » (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.