Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have up until February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and be paid up until the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work attorney who represents federal employees as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really do not consider it a lot a deal. I think it’s a demand to resign with an unclear promise that, possibly, you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is since there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for job up to 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would definitely not explain it as a buyout. I think that’s a very misleading term to utilize in this circumstance. When you consider a buyout, there’s normally some sort of composed arrangement or a concrete offer to provide an advantage in exchange for waiving certain rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your recommendations, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is exercise severe caution. There are no assurances included in this email. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you change your mind, the agency’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you think this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to . Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most mindful because leaving earlier than meant can have serious effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told reporters that this is a great offer for people who do not wish to go back to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they have to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is very generously offering to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal employees are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work actually tough to resign. I think it’s trying to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes due to the fact that there are no warranties. And these are individuals who love their job. They enjoy the mission of the company. They work hard. And today, job they’re dealing with extremely tough options, particularly if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who lives in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: job Do you expect legal obstacles simply to the offer itself? And if so, job on what grounds?BERCOVICI: job This deal, to be truthful, is so unmatched that I think a great deal of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m not sure if the offer itself may be challengeable. I think the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists right now for OPM to buy agencies to give this number of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is quite perhaps setting the phase for obstacles because I feel OPM has actually vastly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you a lot for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and job approvals pages at www.npr.org for further info.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush due date by an NPR specialist. This text may not remain in its last form and may be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may differ. The reliable record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.