Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have till February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to depart and be paid till the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment attorney who represents federal workers as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don’t consider it so much an offer. I believe it’s a request to resign with an unclear guarantee that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for approximately 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: employment Some people have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is since there seems to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I think that’s a really deceptive term to utilize in this circumstance. When you think about a buyout, there’s usually some sort of composed agreement or a concrete deal to supply an advantage in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your advice, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: employment First thing we inform them is exercise extreme care. There are no warranties included in this email. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you alter your mind, the agency’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically giving up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of staff member who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most cautious because leaving earlier than intended can have severe effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a bargain for individuals who do not wish to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a recommendation to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they don’t, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is really generously providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work actually hard to resign. I believe it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes because there are no warranties. And these are people who like their task. They love the mission of the company. They work hard. And today, they’re facing very difficult choices, especially if they’re remote. I suggest, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who resides in Oregon and has been to report to D.C. or employment else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal difficulties just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be truthful, is so extraordinary that I believe a lot of us are still trying to figure out what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the offer itself may be challengeable. I believe the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for OPM to order agencies to offer this variety of people administrative leave. So I think it is extremely much possibly setting the phase for challenges due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually vastly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work lawyer with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for employment joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website terms of usage and employment permissions pages at www.npr.org for further details.

NPR records are created on a rush due date by an NPR specialist. This text may not be in its final form and may be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and employment availability may vary. The reliable record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.